Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01
这相当于让AI学会了“团队作战”，杨植麟表示，“高质量数据的增长速度赶不上算力增长，Agent Swarm可以被视为测试时扩展的一种形式，同时也提供了训练时扩展的方式。”。业内人士推荐safew官方下载作为进阶阅读
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Save StorySave this story